Pro-Holistic Care - Blog

Subscribe!

Low Fat Diets Increase Risk of Death, Study Says




As you probably know, we are a huge proponent of having plenty of healthy fats in your diet.

This old school and precarious advice came about because it was far too easy for us to believe this simple and misleading equation: fat intake = fat on the body. But we now know this fat fable isn't true. 
 
Our bodies are much more complex than this. We need fat to create hormones, maintain healthy cell membranes, and have an excellent neurological function.


Notice I didn't say decent or good neurological function, and that's because fat has been shown to crush neurological disorders. FAT IS GOOD!
 
A study which was released August 29, 2017 examined the dietary habits of 135,000 people and came to the resounding conclusion that “High fat intake – including saturated fat – was associated with a reduced risk of mortality.” Furthermore, this study found that a high carbohydrate diet increased the risk of mortality. Though it did not distinguish between the processed and unprocessed carbohydrates.
 
It essential for the health of our society to destroy the belief that fat is resoundingly bad.
Remember the backlash the recent American Heart Association report received when it recommended against fat and coconut oil? This new study directly contradicts the major points of that report and supports concepts most functional medicine doctors know to be true.
 
The Pure Study: 
 
One of the most powerful aspects of the PURE study is its sheer magnitude. The PURE study followed 135,000 people from 18 countries over 7 years. And throughout that time, as we just learned, overall findings pointed to an increased mortality for those with high carb diets and a decreased risk of mortality for those with high-fat diets.


What's more, this study found “saturated fat in moderation actually appears good for you.”
This study does not distinguish between the causes of death and points out, saturated fat findings “had no effect on cardiovascular disease in the model.” This adds to the mounting evidence that saturated fat does not cause cardiovascular disease.
 
Saturated fat has been the unjustified villain of cardiovascular health for the past 60 plus years. We know cardiovascular disease is caused by inflammation, not fat buildup in the arteries, and yet many remain to mislead.
 
You can also read:
 This Bug Increase Heart Attacks (Not Cholesterol)  
 
3 Important Findings:
 
  1. Three or four daily portions of fruit and vegetables appear to have similar benefits as the current recommendation of five. Meaning, it's unnecessary to over-stress about getting exactly five servings of fruits and veggies each day.
  2. The benefits of the fruits, vegetables, and legumes is greater if they are consumed raw. The science behind the idea that raw is better is fairly complicated.
  3. Replacing saturated-fatty-acid intake with carbohydrates had an adverse effect on blood lipids. This study examined the impact of fats, carbohydrates, and proteins on total cholesterol, LDL (“bad”) and HDL (“good”) cholesterol, and apolipoprotein A1 (apoA1) and B (apoB).
 
The PURE Study Directly Contradicts the Recent American Heart Association Report. The participants in the PURE study who had 10-13 percent of their dietary energy intake consist of saturated fat experienced a lower risk of death than those with low levels of saturated fat in their diet. Furthermore, those with very low saturated fat intake experienced harmful consequences.
 
Currently, the average saturated fat intake of Americans is around 14 percent, but the AHA recommends saturated fat intake should be less than six percent of total energy intake – which is dangerously low. This study found saturated fat levels that low increases the risk of mortality.



 
What Do Skeptics Have to Say?


As always, it's best to examine data with a balanced lens. And while I do believe this study is substantial in its support for fat, especially saturated fat, there are a few concerns worth addressing.
 
Firstly, the AHA directly responded to this study, saying that because it used questionnaires it should be interpreted with caution. But the sheer scope of this study in both the number of participants and duration of time is what allows statistics to do its job. When you have a study with numbers of such abundance, statistically relevant information and outliers can be carved out, leaving us with big picture conclusions. The PURE study serves as a strong opponent of conventional diet recommendations.
 
In our practice, we use a complement of diagnostic testing to put together natural health plans to address a wide variety of ill-health conditions.  Getting you and your family tested properly may be the next most crucial decision you make.  Let us know how we can help.
 
Pro-Holistic Care
 

 
References:
http://www.functionalmedicineuniversity.com
http://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/journal-scans/2017/08/29/01/21/associations-of-fats-and-carbohydrate-intake-esc-2017
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2367001/
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1200303#t=article
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11975814
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/raw-veggies-are-healthier/





Please Enter the following and we will contact you to set up an appointment:

New Patient
Existing
Blue Cross Blue Shield
Aetna
Other
Will be paying out of pocket

Comments (0)

No comments yet.

Leave a comment